Assets and Liabilities - Which Nations Make The World Better? Monday's Edition

Which Nations Make The World Better? Series 15 #1

Costa Rica runs on 100% renewable electricity and increased its forest cover from 21% to 60% over four decades. Afghanistan keeps 43% of its population without safe drinking water and restricts basic freedoms under Taliban rule. Norway provides universal healthcare that pushes life expectancy to 83 years while running nearly its entire electrical grid on hydropower. The United States pumps 14.9 tons of carbon dioxide per person into the atmosphere each year—nine times Costa Rica’s emissions—while its citizens live shorter lives than Costa Ricans despite five times the wealth.

These metrics are more important than GDP and military strength because they measure what matters to people and the planet. Some nations make the planet cleaner, lives longer, and freedoms stronger. Others burn through resources, shorten lives, and crush liberties. Most fall somewhere between.

This week examines which countries function as assets versus liabilities to humanity and the planet, using eleven concrete metrics that measure what actually makes lives better and the environment healthier. Five environmental metrics track climate impact, energy transition, ecosystem health, pollution, and conservation. Six human metrics measure health outcomes, material wellbeing, education, freedom, and basic infrastructure.

The framework reveals patterns that economic rankings miss. Wealth doesn’t guarantee a positive impact. The United States ranks 55th globally for civil liberties, behind Costa Rica, and its citizens die younger than Costa Ricans, despite American per capita income exceeding $70,000 versus Costa Rica’s $13,000. Meanwhile, Afghanistan’s ultra-low carbon emissions (0.3 tons per person) reflect poverty and underdevelopment, not environmental virtue. When 60-70% of your population lives in extreme poverty, and only 43% can read, low emissions mean deprivation, not progress.

Norway demonstrates that natural resource wealth can fund human flourishing rather than corruption. The country converted massive oil and gas reserves into sovereign wealth funds that finance education, healthcare, and infrastructure while maintaining pristine air quality and near-universal renewable electricity. Costa Rica shows that middle-income countries can lead on environmental protection; its reforestation success reversed decades of deforestation while maintaining strong democratic institutions and near-universal literacy.

The metrics also expose uncomfortable truths. Countries can excel in some areas while failing in others. Norway’s 98% renewable electricity coexists with continued oil and gas production for export. The United States achieves near-universal literacy and clean water access while letting civil liberties erode, and emissions climb. Even clear success stories show trade-offs; Costa Rica’s air pollution runs triple the WHO guidelines despite its renewable energy leadership.

This cultural perspective on national performance moves beyond GDP rankings or military power. It asks: Does a country make other people’s lives better? Does it protect or destroy ecosystems? Does it expand or restrict human freedom? The answers separate nations that contribute to human and planetary wellbeing from those that extract, pollute, and oppress.

The eleven metrics expose what tradional measure don’t. You can’t hide behind economic growth when your citizens lack safe water. You can’t claim environmental leadership while burning coal for 60% of electricity. You can’t celebrate freedom while civil liberties scores drop year after year.

Tuesday examines the five environmental metrics: how nations affect climate, ecosystems, and pollution through carbon emissions, renewable energy adoption, forest protection, air quality, and conservation commitments, and whether cultures emphasize self-transcendence (working with nature) versus self-enhancement (controlling nature).

Wednesday covers the six human metrics: life expectancy, poverty rates, literacy, civil liberties, water access, and electricity as measures of whether countries actually improve lives, exploring how quality-of-life-focused cultural values that prioritize caring over achievement and low power distance governance that expects equality rather than accepting hierarchy shape these outcomes.

Thursday profiles the nations that are clear assets to the world: countries excelling on both environmental and human metrics, examining whether shared cultural characteristics like external direction toward nature, low power distance in governance, or caregiver leadership archetypes explain their success.

Friday examines the nations that are clear liabilities to the world: countries failing on both fronts, exploring whether power-seeking leadership archetypes, high power distance, or self-enhancement values drive the connection between environmental degradation and human suffering.

Saturday’s Core Brief synthesizes six cultural patterns that determine whether nations deliver services and protect ecosystems: how low power distance forces universal services, quality-of-life values drive education investment, universalism makes budgets transparent, external direction protects natural systems, collectivism builds renewable energy, and long-term orientation blocks extraction. Culture drives government decisions, and changing liability nations into assets requires cultural change that takes generations.

And we'll explore the patterns of Hornby's psychological archetypes, whether nations led by idea-driven types focused on knowledge, authority, or problem-solving produce different outcomes than those guided by feeling-driven types motivated by tradition, empathy, or creative expression, and how these leadership patterns shape environmental protection and human wellbeing.

More about Hornby’s Archetypes:

If you enjoyed this article, help support my work by “buying me a coffee.”