What Is American Culture? How Americans Use Time and Chase Reward. Friday's Edition.
What does American culture look like to others? Series 17 #5
Americans schedule everything. Meetings start at 10:00, not around 10:00. Lunch is 30 minutes. The dentist books you in 15-minute slots six months out. A dinner invitation for 7:00 means you arrive at 7:00, and if you show up at 7:45 without warning, you have insulted your host. Most of the world thinks this is neurotic.
Edward T. Hall’s Monochronic dimension describes cultures that treat time as linear, segmented, and sequential. The United States is strongly monochronic. Americans do one thing at a time, in order, on schedule. Time is a resource you spend, save, waste, or invest. Language reveals this orientation: “time is money” is not a metaphor to Americans; it is how they genuinely think. Polychronic cultures, which include much of Latin America, Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and the Mediterranean, treat time as fluid. Multiple conversations happen simultaneously, meetings run until the business is finished, regardless of the scheduled time, and relationships are more important than the schedule. An American waiting in a São Paulo office while their Brazilian counterpart takes a personal call during a meeting is not being disrespected. They are experiencing a fundamentally different relationship with time.
But Americans do something contradictory with all that structured time. They demand immediate returns from it. Hofstede’s Short-term Orientation dimension measures whether a culture plans for the long term or chases quick results. The United States is short-term. American businesses report earnings quarterly and fire CEOs who miss two cycles. Startups pitch “rapid scale” and “fast time to market.” Employees expect promotions within two years and leave if they don’t get them. Long-term oriented cultures like China, Japan, and South Korea invest patiently, tolerate years of slow returns, and build organizations designed to outlast any individual leader. Americans build the most rigid schedules in the world and then demand that those schedules deliver instant payoffs, a combination that baffles cultures on both sides of the divide.
When work stops, Americans flip a switch. Hofstede’s Indulgence dimension measures how freely a culture permits the enjoyment of life and gratification of desires. The United States scores highly indulgent. Americans work relentlessly and then spend aggressively on leisure, entertainment, travel, dining, and personal pleasure. Restrained cultures, concentrated in Eastern Europe, much of Asia, and the Muslim world, control gratification through social norms, and duty is more important than enjoyment. Americans see a hard week of work as earning the right to an indulgent weekend. The American pattern of grinding productivity followed by unapologetic consumption looks excessive and undisciplined to many other cultures.
Hornby’s archetypes expose why this combination can seem contradictory. Americans impose rigid structure on their time, a Blue and North trait rooted in idea-based organization and the need for sequential control. They demand immediate results from that structure, a South and Red trait driven by the need for practical, tangible outcomes right now. Then they spend freely on pleasure when the clock stops, a Red trait tied to emotional expressiveness and immediate gratification. The scheduling discipline and the pleasure-seeking come from opposite ends of Hornby’s framework. No single archetype or blend captures the full pattern, which suggests American time-and-reward culture is not a personality type but a system that activates different psychological drives depending on whether the clock is running.
Read more on the archetypes
This is not a regional quirk. A New York investment banker and a Kansas City teacher operate on different scales but follow the same cultural rhythm: structure the time, extract fast results, reward yourself when it ends. Regional variation changes the intensity, not the pattern.
Saturday’s Core Brief pulls together the 12 dimensions and examines how this system clashes with global norms.
Sidebar: Schwartz’s Ten Basic Values
Self-Direction (independent thought and action)
Stimulation (excitement, novelty, challenge)
Hedonism (pleasure and sensuous gratification)
Achievement (personal success through demonstrated competence)
Power (social status, control over people and resources)
Security (safety, harmony, stability)
Conformity (restraint of actions that may harm others or violate expectations)
Tradition (respect and commitment to cultural or religious customs)
Benevolence (concern for the welfare of others close to us)
Universalism (concern for the welfare of all people and nature)
If you enjoyed this article, help support my work by subscribing or “buying me a coffee.”