The Future Brief: The Next World Order - From Exploitation to Exchange

No conquest, no colonization, no coups - trade

Aug 25, 2025

What will the future world look like -the new new world order?

The age of the superpower is over. The new, new world order will not be dominated by a single empire but shared among four, maybe five, power centers: China, the European Union, the United States, BRICS, and possibly India.

The question is not whether America can lead; it’s shown it can not, but whether it can adapt. Can it accept its loss as a superpower to be one among equals in a multipolar world built not on exploitation but cooperation, collaboration, and common good?

The Historical Pattern

History shows that every world order has revolved around resources. The first modern hegemony, Spain and Portugal, built global empires by brutally conquering lands, enslaving populations, and extracting gold and silver on a massive scale. In the second stage of hegemony, Britain and France refined the model, a less brutal colonial system of exploitation under the guise of trade, railroads, and legal systems. The third stage, the United States and Soviet Union, pursued resource extraction and exploitation through ideology, alliances, coups, and proxy wars rather than direct conquest.

Now, we enter the fourth stage, and the pattern is shifting again. For the first time in modern history, power is being balanced across several poles rather than concentrated in one or two. Resources remain at the center, but the methods are changing. Instead of pure extraction, states are moving toward trade and negotiation, still unequal, but not brutal or nearly as exploitative.

It won’t be perfect, but it will be much better.

Timeline of Transformation

1500s–1600s: The Age of Conquest
Spain and Portugal dominated through slavery, plunder, and violent extraction. Their brutality created wealth for them, but their empires couldn’t withstand the competition they unleashed.
1700s–1800s: The Colonial Powers
Britain and France refined empire, industrializing extraction through plantations, railroads, and global trade. Exploitation was less overtly brutal, but more systematic. Their dominance eventually collapsed under the strain of world wars.
1900s-2000: The Superpowers
The United States and the Soviet Union replaced empires with spheres of influence. Resources were still central, oil, grain, minerals, but now fought through ideology, alliances, and proxy wars. The Soviet collapse left America briefly alone at the top.
2000s–?: The Multipolar World
The US no longer dictates global order by itself. China’s growth, the EU’s regulatory reach, BRICS’ resource leverage, and India’s demographic surge are reshaping power into a multipolar system where negotiation, not unilateral dominance, defines the rules, nations have choices, and the powers cooperate more than compete.

Drivers of Change

Conquest, colonialism, and coups failed because they are extractive. Only so much can be taken before the system collapses or people rebel. Only an inclusive system endures for the long term, and this is the closest we’ve come to it.

As with most grand changes, the right set of circumstances must coalesce to a point of critical mass, and a shift becomes inevitable.

The collapse of the United States as a superpower is one of those forces. Decades of Republican obstruction hollowed out governance, eroded trust in institutions, and weakened America’s ability to act with consistency abroad. Under the Trump-Republican dictatorship, this decline accelerated, alliances fractured, trade wars destabilized markets, and US leadership gave way to chaos and unpredictability. That vacuum opened the door for others to step in. China’s long-term industrial growth and ecological strategy provided an alternative model of stability. The European Union, through its regulatory strength, demonstrated how institutions and standards could shape the global economy as effectively as armies. BRICS expanded into a resource bloc, giving the Global South greater leverage in negotiations. And India, propelled by demographics and rapid growth, is moving steadily toward great-power status, not yet consolidated, but already shaping the balance.

The Cultural Perspective

Each pole represents not only different resources but also different cultural approaches to power. The United States remains individualist, short-term, and low power distance, capable of innovation and driving forward progress, but often unwilling to compromise for long-term prosperity, and still mired in a zero-sum, winner-takes-all mentality. China is collectivist, long-term oriented, and high-context, prioritizing planning, harmony, and patient strategy. The European Union reflects universalism and rule-based cooperation, using institutions to set standards and enforce agreements. BRICS is a particularist coalition, united less by ideology than by resource leverage and a desire for alternatives to Western dominance. India reflects a collectivist, high-context culture, but remains fragmented by its internal diversity, a pole still in formation.

The Future Ahead

What does the new new world order look like when power is shared instead of commanded? When resources are negotiated and traded, not forcibly extracted?

For the first time, empires will not dictate the rules. Instead, trade, technology, and security are negotiated among several poles. That balance changes everyday life and not just for those who would have previously been conquered.

Prices will be shaped not only by Wall Street or Washington, but by how blocs agree, or fail to agree, on global supply chains. Your phone may run on European data rules, Chinese hardware, American software, and be assembled under trade terms bargained through BRICS.

Standards for climate, food, and technology will not come from dictates or even treaties, but from which bloc has the strictest standards. If a company wants access to the market with the highest standards, it will need to meet the standards of that market. Corporations won’t manufacture different models to meet each standard; they will manufacture one that meets the strictest standard.

For Americans, this means adjusting to a world where the US is powerful but not dominant. A world where compromise abroad secures stability at home. Where jobs and prosperity depend on cooperation with other nations. For others, it means more bargaining power, more seats at the table, and a more equitable system.

The future will not erase inequality, but it will get us closer to equality. Each global order moving closer to fairness and equality.

Join us for more cultural perspective on TikTok and YouTube