Tanzania: Reforms In A Semi-Democracy
Tanzania has long held itself up as a success case in East Africa, a country that grew steadily, avoided major conflict, and expanded access to basic services. It has long been a democracy, but in practice, there are constraints on political opposition, media freedom, and civil society. So, the question is, does the system work for ordinary people, or only for those with connections?
What Tanzania was — and what pushed change
Tanzania is a presidential republic, but its political space has often been constrained. Since 2015, laws such as the Media Services Act and Cybercrimes Act have tightened control over media and online expression. Critics say the government has limited opposition and reduced freedom of information.
Economically, the state has pursued growth through infrastructure, mining, and public investment. But many rural areas and informal sectors lag behind. The social safety net was thin, and basic services like water, schooling, and health often suffered from weak capacity or poor oversight.
Over time, pressure built. Tanzania’s leaders recognized that to sustain legitimacy and attract foreign investment, they needed to move from expansion alone to inclusion. Growth without fairness risks instability, especially when the population expects more.
The course correction
Tanzania’s reform path is careful, experimental, and tactical.
In 2024, Tanzania’s Rule of Law score in the World Justice Project nudged upward, moving to 96th out of 142 countries. That gain was small, but it was a gain and a gain in a region where many countries are moving in the opposite direction.
The government has started programs to directly help citizens. Such as the Productive Social Safety Net in which households get periodic cash payments if they meet conditions such as sending children to school and attending health checkups. Able-bodied adults can take part in labor-intensive public projects during lean seasons, earning extra income and helping community infrastructure. These and similar types of programs have benefitted over 5.3 million people from 2012 to 2018, with more women than men among recipients.
More recently, in October 2024, Tanzania began promoting gender-responsive land governance reforms, a move toward recognizing women’s property rights in customary systems.
In 2024–2025, the IMF and World Bank partnered with Tanzania on climate and resource-management reforms, including water management, land planning, and strengthening oversight of financial risks tied to climate impacts.
These moves directly help the people but do not loosen the grip of Tanzania’s ruling political elite. Laws curbing speech and opposition power remain in place. The judiciary still faces constraints, and local governments often lack a budget or skilled staff.
But these are first steps, not finish lines. The question is whether Tanzania will continue on the path of inclusion, improving services, courts, and local governance.
The Cultural Dimensions
Tanzania, like many cultural, works through personal relationships and personal networks. While this does work at the small scale, it does not work well for a national government. This is particularism in Hofstede’s and Trompenaars’ terms — rules applied based on the person, not the law. Reformers are now trying to shift that toward universalism, where everyone follows the same clear procedures.
The country’s collectivist culture also matters. Tanzanians value harmony and community over confrontation, which explains why reform has been gradual, consensus-based, and guided from the top. Hofstede’s power distance dimension is visible here: authority is respected, and leadership by example is more effective than opposition from below.
High-context communication, where much is understood through relationships and tone rather than direct words, has also influenced reform. When officials began publishing fee schedules and eligibility criteria, it reduced the guesswork that once favored insiders. Now, a farmer applying for a small grant or a woman seeking a land title can follow posted steps instead of navigating hidden expectations.
Finally, Tanzania’s openness to outside partners plays a role. The country has long cooperated with international institutions, NGOs, and regional programs. That aligns with Schwartz’s “openness to change” and GLOBE’s “institutional collectivism.” External frameworks, from climate adaptation to anti-corruption benchmarks, provide structure and incentives that help domestic institutions become more predictable and inclusive.
The general culture and community culture remain the same, but the government culture must change.
Hornby’s Archetypes — How Leadership Style Supports Reform
Hornby’s Archetypes support the cultural shifts.
Blue / Guardian: The state’s priority remains order and continuity. Reform efforts emphasize stability, avoiding chaotic liberal shifts, while upgrading governance.
West / Sage: The design of policy relies heavily on diagnostics, data, and external technical input.
East / Communicator: Negotiation and coalition-building are needed, especially between central ministries, local governments, donor agencies, and civil society.
Bridge-Builder: Tanzania increasingly positions reforms as a bridge between global commitments and local expectations, aligning external standards with domestic legitimacy.
These archetypes help explain how reforms are carried out: with a balance of order, expertise, hands-on execution, and consensus-building.
Bottom Line
Tanzania is taking small but deliberate steps to turn its government and economy into inclusive working institutions. Rising rule-of-law scores, rollout of social safety nets, and land-governance changes show the state is changing to meet demands for fairness. The movement is slow and uneven, but it is happening.
Tanzania is another reminder that inclusive progress can come by aligning culture, policy, and implementation rather than by rebellion. The question is not whether will it happen, but will it happen quickly enough for everyone.
Join us for more cultural perspective on TikTok and YouTube
Tiktok failed to load.Enable 3rd party cookies or use another browser
