Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marc B Christensen's avatar

"It spread because religion is the most durable transmission mechanism humans have produced."

Religion is to the group what belief is to the individual – essential and foundational. Philosophy is important in asking rational questions, but religion is much more comprehensive and handles life at both the irrational and mundane margins.

No group would thrive nor long survive without religion ... so much more than believing in “God”.

Walter Clark's avatar

I'm intrigued by the notion that religion is the most powerful transmitter of culture. Could science be a similar transmitter of culture? It is different than faith in that it rejects unfalsifiable truth; truth that is so important, that it can overrule mere reason. But in modern times, science facts have as much respect as the unfalsifiable beliefs of religion. But as soon as some physics fact is stretched to include some cultural advice or rule, its falsifiability is lost and it is thrown out of the science realm.

But what if it turns out that behavior-advice in the form of laws or legislation that directs expenditure, can have rational roots? That emotion based legislation (such as being poor as a claim on those who aren't) cannot overwhelm reason, is possible. . . it's just difficult. Ah ha, but what if A-I is so pervasive that every ruling, every communication between legislators was overheard by a personal A-I to correct illogic and to remove the sacredness of an unfalsifiable belief?

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?