Culture - The Force That Sets The Rules. Thursday's Edition
The force is within us. Series 19 #4
Something wonderful just happened to you. Does everyone in the room know within five seconds, or does no one notice until you tell a friend over dinner?
A different question. When you walk into a room full of strangers, what earns your respect? Is it what someone has accomplished, their track record, their expertise? Or is it who they are: their age, their title, their family name, the fact that everyone else in the room defers to them?
And when you show up to a dinner party, do you arrive at the time on the invitation, or does “8:00” mean somewhere between 8:30 and 9:15, and everyone knows that?
These are not actions we think about in our own culture because our culture already programmed us how to respond.
A German couple in Munich receives a dinner invitation for 7:00 PM from their Saudi neighbors. They arrive at 6:58, ring the doorbell, and hand over a bottle of wine and a wrapped gift to the host’s elderly father, who answered the door. The German husband shakes his hand, introduces himself by first name, and walks in to greet his friend who invited him.
He’s committed several cultural violations. He treated the oldest person in the room as a doorman and walked past him to greet the younger friend because personal connection mattered more to him than position.
In the Saudi household, the grandfather isn’t just an older relative. He is the family’s highest-ranking member, and guests honor him first regardless of who they know. Age, position, and family standing determine who you greet, where you sit, and whose opinion carries weight. The German guest ranked people by personal familiarity. The Saudi family ranked them by standing.
Researcher Fons Trompenaars called this the achievement versus ascription dimension. In achievement cultures like Germany, Switzerland, and Australia, status comes from what you’ve done: your skills, your results, your proven competence. A 30-year-old who built a successful company outranks a 60-year-old who inherited one. In ascription cultures like Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, and China, status comes from who you are: your age, family, title, or position in the social structure. A young person with a brilliant track record still defers to the elder in the room.
The same dinner reveals a second collision. The Germans arrived at 6:58 because 7:00 means 7:00. Time is a fixed resource, schedules are commitments, and showing up late disrespects the host’s planning. Anthropologist Edward Hall called this monochronic time. In Saudi Arabia, which operates on polychronic time, 7:00 is a general reference point. The evening unfolds when the right people have gathered, the conversation finds its rhythm, and the meal appears when it’s ready. Arriving exactly on time signals rigidity, not respect, and rushing a guest out the door because “it’s getting late” would embarrass the host.
This combination explains why the right answer at the wrong time in the wrong order gets you nowhere. A German sales engineer in Riyadh arrives five minutes early to a meeting, opens her laptop, and presents flawless data to the room. But the senior Saudi decision-maker hasn’t arrived because the meeting starts when he arrives. When he does, he expects the most senior German present to greet him first. A 29-year-old analyst with perfect numbers doesn’t register as someone worth listening to because competence without standing is meaningless from his cultural perspective.
Your cultural perspective sets the rules for interaction, the ones that determine whether anyone listens to you or not.
Friday’s Edition examines how all of this invisible programming leads you to misjudge others, and why the judgments that feel most obviously correct are often the most culturally biased.
Sidebar:
Achievement vs. Ascription (Trompenaars): Whether a culture assigns status based on what a person has accomplished or based on who they are: their age, title, family, or social position.
Monochronic vs. Polychronic Time (Hall): Whether a culture treats time as a fixed, linear resource where schedules are commitments, or as a fluid backdrop where relationships and context determine when things happen.
If you enjoyed this article, help support my work by becoming a paid subscriber or “buying me a coffee.”